Russell Davies

As disappointed as you are
About | Feed | Archive | Findings | This blog by email

No coffee morning tomorrow

ie: No coffee morning on Wednesday 19th.

Coffee resumes on the 26th. 8am Caffe Tropea, Russell Square

March 18, 2025 | Permalink

Learning from TikTok

I've been thinking about this a lot for my Powerpoint remoting project but there are wider lessons for the attention industries anyway: it's the obsessive, experimental, imaginative way the TikTok crowd think about hacking attention.

@brandbosshq The Pope in the Pool method? Absolute genius. It keeps your audience engaged while delivering key information seamlessly. Shout out to @Yasin for such a great video — had to chime in on how effective this is. #StorytellingTips #MarketingStrategy #BrandEngagement #AudienceConnection #ContentCreation ♬ memories - leadwave

A lot of this is still folk wisdom but there are some important differences between this and the previous generation of clickjackers.

  1. They want you to watch, not click. That's different. And it means there are useful lessons for everyone else who wants you to watch. They're not going to create a Reach clickbaithellscape. (They might be creating a different hellscape but not that one)
  2. They're sharing. They can't help telling you what they've learned. That's what makes something science rather than alchemy. 

March 16, 2025 | Permalink

Remoting: reference

@gee_derrick

Maybe I should stream with a contact mix dog collar on

♬ original sound - Derrick Gee

I don't have great reference for this but The News is increasingly looking like an old school powerpoint presentation. But with a lot of motion.

News Powerpoint

And, of course, Swimming To Cambodia

Swimming To Cambodia\

 

March 15, 2025 | Permalink

Elevator

Wonderful talk from James. Grist for this mill.

March 12, 2025 | Permalink

Flood the screen

More to this.

One of the ways I think I am now wrong is that screens work differently in a hybrid world.

Your face / presence does a lot of work in a live presentation. It attracts and soaks up a lot of attention.

In a zoom-type presentation your face is normally tiny and pixelated and if your slide is still, stark and simple it just doesn't do enough to keep people watching. (And that's even more important when they're not in the room with you).

So perhaps the model needs to be more like this or this:

@fbinegotiator Being Wrong Is A GOOD Thing #communicationskills #persuasion #negotiator ♬ original sound - Chris Voss

Big face, lots happening, constantly demanding attention

 

March 11, 2025 | Permalink

Another good rule

One of the things I wanted to do with the Do Interesting book was to collect examples of 'useful tricks people know or notice because of the jobs they do'. (The French have a term for it, sort of: "déformation professionnelle")

It didn't really work. I couldn't find enough.

But here's a great one from Dan: how to tell when your art is bad. (Print art, specifically, but probably useful for lots of things)

 

March 10, 2025 | Permalink

Writing with robots

Something else for the notes on AI category:

March 09, 2025 | Permalink

Refusal to hack

This has been flying around my dark socials the last couple of days. It's good:

"A few years ago, direct-to-consumer brands were everywhere. They all had a sleek aesthetic, a compelling brand story, and—more often than not—the same product sourced from the same supply chains. Their differentiation lay more in their customer acquisition strategies. The best DTC brands weren’t product companies; they were customer acquisition machines, built on arbitrage opportunities in Facebook and Instagram ads.

The newsletter economy is starting to look a lot like that.

At a newsletter conference recently, I noticed something: many of the most successful operators don’t think of themselves as publishers. They’re entrepreneurs first, content creators second. Their goal isn’t to build an editorial brand—it’s to master acquisition, churn prevention, and lifetime value. They take a unit economics approach to publishing that isn’t nearly as pronounced in institutional media.

And the risk, just like in DTC, is this model works until the arbitrage disappears. In DTC, ad costs skyrocketed, and many brands collapsed when they had to compete on product, not just marketing. In newsletters, AI-generated content and inbox algorithms could make traditional acquisition strategies obsolete. The playbook of buying cheap attention and then arbitrage with ads, front-end offers, courses and the like will grow harder."

Around this time of year, pre-Interesting, I regularly have conversations where people ask me about 'monetising' Interesting. Or some other stupid thing I've started.

And I resist. And the story I tell myself about resisting is normally around it's too much work, and it's not worth it and I already have a job. And that's all true.

But it's also this (above). It's that I know too much about what you actually have to do once you set off down that path. There's no logical end. If you want it to grow and make money you have to dedicate yourself to not doing the activity you actually wanted to do in the first place. You stop being someone putting on a conference and you become a growth-hacker. And growth hacking stops working once all the growth has been hacked.

Or something.

Anyway.

 

March 06, 2025 | Permalink

Mark Pawson - a lovely inspiration

Mark Pawson probably inspired me more than any other single person. I found one of his Kinder Eggs books in the ICA a thousand years ago and instantly wanted to be a person who made stuff like that.

It's a treasured possession. So treasured that I'm 100% sure where it is, like all the most important things.

I've probably got more art by him than by anyone else. All good. All for everyone. All pretty cheap. I met him a couple of times at book art fairs, selling his lovely stuff. He was always kind and funny.

Sad to hear that he's died.

Screenshot 2025-03-04 at 19.22.18

Screenshot 2025-03-04 at 19.15.42
Screenshot 2025-03-04 at 19.15.42
Screenshot 2025-03-04 at 19.15.42

March 04, 2025 | Permalink

Precisely imprecise

I love the nerdery on display here. And it's important.

@oxfordmathematics Words are easily misunderstood. Especially when it comes to predicting events. Your "might" could be my "likely". But can you put a number on words? Watch David Spiegelhalter's full lecture on our YouTube Channel (link in bio) . #stem #maths #math #mathematics #probability #oxforduniversity ♬ original sound - Oxford Mathematics

Related: Smidgen, pinch, dollop, dash, and drop

March 03, 2025 | Permalink

« Previous | Next »