Matt was kind enough to send me a top thing: Paul Kedrosky's One-Sentence Challenge. (original post here)
"Physicist Richard Feynman once said that if all knowledge
about physics was about to expire the one sentence he would tell the
future is that "Everything is made of atoms". What one sentence would
you tell the future about your own area, whether it's entrepreneurship,
hedge funds, venture capital, or something else?
Examples: An economist might say that "People respond to
incentives". I had an engineering professor years ago who said all of
that field could be reduced to "F=MA and you can't push on a rope".
What a great idea. And it solves a problem for me - let's make that the Account Planning School of the Web assignment for December. (I'm still crunching through the Maple Syrup entries hope to get them up soon. Sorry.)
Let's pretend that the future might be interested in whatever it is we do and try and tell it a sentence that might be of use to future planners/brand people/communications people/whatever. Get your entries in by January 8th. You can add your sentence as a comment below or email me. I'm looking forward to this.
That's a great assignment.
(That wasn't an entry, just a comment.)
Posted by: Ben | December 18, 2006 at 09:38 PM
Legitimising the illegitimate.
Posted by: John Dodds | December 18, 2006 at 10:16 PM
"A good British accent isn't necessary, but it helps."
Posted by: david | December 18, 2006 at 11:07 PM
"A brand is a shared idea that is both a noun and a verb."
I think it gets across the point that a brand is an idea that both marketers and people share in making (because it's made inside their heads).
And I wanted to tell the future that it's easy to get caught up in the abstract noun part of it (e.g., "Apple is creative technology") and forget that at least half the brand is in the verb of using/buying it (e.g., "I love my iPod because it's easy-to-use.")
Hopefully that doesn't sell our discipline short.
Posted by: Dan Ng | December 19, 2006 at 12:54 AM
Everything is art, not everything is good art.
Posted by: Flo | December 19, 2006 at 08:10 AM
"People subconsciously use brands to express and extend their personality."
Posted by: nico | December 19, 2006 at 08:17 AM
if you want to keep 100% control of your brand, keep it to yourself.
Posted by: eric S | December 19, 2006 at 08:26 AM
People are emotional
Posted by: daniel joseph | December 19, 2006 at 08:34 AM
Know before you do. Or the other way around.
Posted by: Elias Betinakis | December 19, 2006 at 09:27 AM
Emotions Motivate The Most Powerful Rection Within Humanity.
[or 'Humans Are Helpless To The Power Of Emotions']
... so communication needs to understand what emotion/s will motivate the right consumer action for clients business needs.
Posted by: Rob @ Cynic | December 19, 2006 at 09:44 AM
"Brands are about people"
Posted by: Ashish Banerjee | December 19, 2006 at 10:29 AM
I've got 2:
1) If you're on the edge of things, make sure it's the cutting edge.
2) Make sure you've got something to say.
Posted by: Chris | December 19, 2006 at 10:30 AM
Tell the truth well and be nice to people.
Speed (of Planning on Subversion) gave me 'Tell the truth well', of which I am constantly reminded. I added the second part on impulse as I wrote this.
Posted by: Ben Mason | December 19, 2006 at 10:51 AM
Create interesting conversations.
Posted by: Picklin paul | December 19, 2006 at 10:58 AM
account planning tries to be the conceptual art of advertising
Posted by: gordon euchler | December 19, 2006 at 11:48 AM
“Sooner or later the Sun always comes out”
Posted by: Chris Koutsoukos | December 19, 2006 at 12:19 PM
selling something to someone.
Posted by: Fenton Benton | December 19, 2006 at 01:03 PM
If Physicists say, "Everything is made of atoms" and Economists say, "People respond to incentives" ...
Wouldn't we want to say something like, "People will communicate with each other"?
Posted by: Clay Parker Jones | December 19, 2006 at 02:46 PM
Immerse yourself in everything.
Posted by: Johanna | December 19, 2006 at 03:42 PM
learn to learn
Posted by: Richard buchanan | December 19, 2006 at 04:19 PM
I think the problem is that economics and physics are of a different category to planning.
Both of them are useful reductions (if limited in scope - try explain love with physics or what thoughts are like with economics): the truth about planning is that just like people it cannot be reduced. It is interdisciplinary and its greatest insights often come unheralded and (counterintuitively) unplanned. It is human, and it just is.
If I have to give a response, it will have to dodge the question a bit I'm afraid. Perhaps: "you will never be able to predict exactly what people will do when they see something new, but if you spend time watching them your predictions will get better".
Posted by: james | December 19, 2006 at 04:34 PM
There's more to life than advertising.
Posted by: Adrian Lai | December 19, 2006 at 05:04 PM
No shit.
But if you are going to be good at advertising then you better consider as much of life as possible.
Posted by: james | December 19, 2006 at 05:13 PM
A brand is a living, breathing thing.
Posted by: Lauren | December 19, 2006 at 05:46 PM
James, if the idea is to reduce it to one sentence, then you're going to get something that is limited. I think that's the nature of the game. And I don't think we can consider planning to be more complex and irreducible than economics, physics, or anything else.
By the way, I like your sentence. It's fantastic advice.
Posted by: Clay Parker Jones | December 19, 2006 at 05:53 PM