Russell Davies

As disappointed as you are
About | Feed | Archive | Findings | This blog by email

lower your standards

Book 14. Confessions of a Conjuror by Derren Brown.

To be honest, I don't really remember reading this. This is the bit I highlighted though, and I love it:

A poet I knew once suggested, while addressing a group of students, that the would-be versifiers improve their skills by writing a poem first thing each morning. When one of the students complained that it took her weeks to write a poem that she was happy with, and that the idea of writing one every morning seemed an impossibility, his answer was brilliant: ‘Lower your standards.’

 

December 09, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

looking back it's so bizarre

Book, er, something. How I Escaped My Certain Fate by Stewart Lee. This was a good book. And, especially a good excuse for a book, in all the right senses. It's a sort of director's commentary on his old comedy routines.

The director's commentary is a great new form. Possibly one of the few really new ones, like live-blogging, and Mr Lee does it really well.

All my time-lagged social media are warning me that I'm coming up to the one-year anniversary of various interesting things going on in my life and I can feel the director's commentary urge coming on. Wondering to myself what I thought I was doing. Maybe when I've got all these books out of the way.

Anyway.

Sometimes I think eighties music genuinely was more original and interesting than anything since, and sometimes I realise I'm an old fool. I guess both things could be true:

"Writing this now, God, how I miss the cultural side of the eighties – the rhetoric, the raggedy clothes, the politics, gigs you were frightened to go into, Radio 1 when it had weird bits, Channel 4 when it was radical, the NME when it had writers, and the thrill of discovering underground music and new comedy for yourself. Or maybe I just miss being eighteen, and like all those columnists who turned forty sometime in the late nineties and wrote simultaneous think-pieces on why Punk was the best thing ever, I’m just confusing the thrill of being young with the notion that the era in which I was young was in any way especially creative or remarkable."

It's probably healthy to move on enough in your life that you can be appalled by your own behaviour:

"I don’t know if I’d do this material now. I am so politically correct these days that picking on someone because they couldn’t spell properly would seem wrong. Mocking the uneducated, disenfranchised white working class for being uneducated probably isn’t the best way to get them to feel less isolated and to stop being so racist. What is? I don’t know, but I look back on bits of these routines from half a decade ago and sometimes I wonder who the person doing them was."

Ah. Is it art? Everything that isn't art is better than it.

"comedian Simon Munnery, who invented top-selling computer games for the ZX81 whilst still a teenager, was reviewed, favourably, by the Guardian recently as ‘the closest stand-up comedy gets to art’, and has pointed out himself that this suggests that however good stand-up gets, it can never really be art. There is an impassable canyon between the two. Munnery has since decided that rather than it being good comedy, he now wants his work to be categorised as ‘shit art’."

That's the big lesson. Don't revel in boring. Go beyond it:

"The composer John Cage said, ‘If something is boring after two minutes, try it for four. If still boring, then eight. Then sixteen. Then thirty-two. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all."

December 07, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

a visit

Book 12. Anne has a theory that I don't read any books by women. She's wrong of course. Except for all the evidence that she's right. The data from my Kindle certainly suggests she's right. I've not looked closely, I'm scared to, but it's probably only about 10% woman authors. That's not good. I can't explain it. But it doesn't seem good.

On top of that, I'm even more ashamed to say that I didn't really enjoy Jennifer Egan's A Visit From The Goon Squad. Possibly alone amongst all the people I know. Just didn't get on with it. Didn't even get to the famous Powerpoint bit.

I loved these two little moments though:

"It had a beautiful screwdriver in it, the orange translucent handle gleaming like a lollipop in its worn leather loop, the silvery shaft sculpted, sparkling."

"He’s rigged a tiny cassette player with a small set of foam earphones to listen to demo tapes and rough mixes. Occasionally, he’ll hand the device to Mindy, wanting her opinion, and each time, the experience of music pouring directly against her eardrums – hers alone – is a shock that makes her eyes well up; the privacy of it, the way it transforms her surroundings into a golden montage, as if she were looking back on this lark in Africa with Lou from some distant future."

December 07, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

bombercraft and hovercasters

Book 11. Stalin Ate My Homework by Alexi Sayle. I'd forgotten I'd read this, but I really liked it.  He's got a nice way of remembering. (You get the same thing from this, if you can track down a copy.)

About his Dad:

But it was the tools of Joe’s trade that really fascinated me. Each night he would come home and give me his leather satchel, which held a battered and scratched black paraffin lantern with red and green filters that could be placed over the clear glass lens to warn of danger or give the all-clear, a red and a green flag, squares of linen stitched to a thick wooden baton for the same purpose. In his waistcoat he carried a metallic-tasting whistle and a big fob watch like a miniature station clock.

The same juxtapositions I remember from his comedy, but warmer, realer:

Though everybody understood that here was a man who was dedicated to introducing a one-party state in which government terror was a central tool for ensuring the dictatorship of the proletariat I would hear people say, ‘You couldn’t meet a nicer bloke than Joe Sayle.’

the taxi firm were representatives of the petit bourgeoisie – that class which in Marxist terms ‘owned their own means of production’ and whose political allegiance could therefore switch between the ruling and the working-class depending on self-interest

Not just for only children:

Being an only child was a bit like taking an extraordinarily long train journey: you were always trying to find something to do to pass the time. At first I just told myself tales inside my head, but then I discovered that drawing was a great way to give the stories in my brain an external life.

Lovely.

Then I had an idea: the next time I got my pocket money I hurried down to the toy shop and bought not one but two kits. One was for a Lancaster bomber and the other was of an SRN1 hovercraft. I then sat at the dining table and proceeded to combine them, so what I ended up with was a gluey lump which was basically a hovercraft with four Merlin engines, large wings and a number of swivelling turrets equipped with machine guns. I thought to myself, ‘This is more like it.’ Rather than just accruing things, arranging them and exulting in my possession of them I was making a new and original thing – a Bombercraft or a Hovercaster.
Properly true.
It was the same with all the ‘progressives’ I had encountered: their vision of the world to come was either a brutal, uncompromising futurism or camp pastoralism such as that which inspired the garden city movement and its deformed child, the new towns. Nowhere across the whole spectrum of the left did there seem to be any appreciation of anything that was worn, anything that was industrial, in fact anything that was working-class.

 

 

 

 

December 06, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

bluntness, whimsy and pre-wheel primitives

Books eight, nine and ten are combinable. A single highlight from each. Both big slabs of scienceficitonal worldifying. I was in a mood for that stuff. It happens.

Peter F Hamilton's The Evolutionary Void contains this handy description of the world of RIG:

"They didn’t speak any human language, she knew; nor had they ever shown any interest in anything other than their own peculiar tongue, with all its cooing and warbling and trills that conveyed only the shallowest of meaning. Commonwealth cultural experts assigned to the world-walking aliens found it hard to follow their whimsy. Allegedly it indicated a completely different neural process to that of blunt human rationality."

And this bit from Neal Asher's The Technician (Polity 4) is a brilliant and surprising truth to be found amidst the space violence.

"‘Too little drama,’ Amistad stated. ‘Humans always require drama when changing underlying belief structures else they fall back into the old patterns. They need an excess of pain, joy, strong emotion or new experience, to impress the change upon the dull recording medium between their ears.’"

And this bit from Surface Detail by Iain M. Banks will come in handy for many a presentation about technological discontinuity.

"We’re like pre-wheel primitives looking at a screen and saying it can’t work because nobody can re-draw a cave-painting that quickly.”"

December 05, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

f.a.

My friends and compadres at the London Strategy Unit have been blogging for a little while. (BLOGGING IS MANDATORY when I'm around). Lots of good and meaty stuff about brands and that. But today brought the first post that felt like a real look behind the curtain, the first moment when one of them was who they really are. Pop over and see Matt, grinning, delighted and embarrased, standing next to the FA Cup.

December 05, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

extra reality

reality hunger

I've done this one before. Reality Hunger: A Manifesto by David Shields. Given the nature of the book it seems entirely appropriate to simply cut and past the best bits as one long slab. Find the meaning where you fancy.

There was a reason the church was the main cultural unifier in Western Europe: it had the best distribution network and the most mass-produced item—the Bible.

“This is a work of fiction. No person in it bears any resemblance to any actual person living or dead, etc., etc. London does not exist.”

Emerson called the new literature he’d been looking for “a panharmonicon. Here everything is admissible—philosophy, ethics, divinity, criticism, poetry, humor, fun, mimicry, anecdote, jokes, ventriloquism—all the breadth and versatility of the most liberal conversation, highest and lowest personal topics: all are permitted, and all may be combined into one speech.”

Collage, the art of reassembling fragments of preexisting images in such a way as to form a new image, was the most important innovation in the art of the twentieth century.
The tour guide said, “Rothko is great because he forced artists who came after him to change how they thought about painting.” This is the single most useful definition of artistic greatness I’ve ever encountered.
Modernism ran its course, emptying out narrative. Novels became all voice, anchored neither in plot nor circumstance, driving the storytelling impulse underground. The sound of voice alone grew less compelling; the longing for narration rose up again, asserting the oldest claim on the reading heart: the tale. What could be more literal than The Story of My Life now being told by Everywoman and Everyman?
Painting isn’t dead. The novel isn’t dead. They just aren’t as central to the culture as they once were.
Our lives aren’t prepackaged along narrative lines and, therefore, by its very nature, reality-based art—underprocessed, underproduced—splinters and explodes.
The lyric essay asks what happens when an essay begins to behave less like an essay and more like a poem. What happens when an essayist starts imagining things, making things up, filling in blank spaces, or leaving the blanks blank? What happens when statistics, reportage, and observation in an essay are abandoned for image, emotion, expressive transformation?
Copies don’t count anymore; copies of isolated books, bound between inert covers, soon won’t mean much. Copies of their texts, however, will gain in meaning as they multiply by the millions and are flung around the world, indexed, and copied again. What counts are the ways in which these common copies of a creative work can be linked, manipulated, tagged, highlighted, bookmarked, translated, enlivened by other media, and sewn together in the universal library.
Contemporary narration is the account of the manufacturing of the work, not the actual work.
Have you ever heard a song that makes you feel as good as Stevie Wonder’s “Fingertips—Part 2”? I haven’t. It’s so real. When you listen to the song, you can hear a guy in the band yelling, “What key? What key?” He’s lost. But then he finds the key, and boom. Every time I hear that guy yelling, “What key?” I get excited.
Plot, like erected scaffolding, is torn down, and what stands in its place is the thing itself.
There isn’t any story.It’s not the story. It’s just this breathtaking world—that’s the point. The story’s not important; what’s important is the way the world looks. That’s what makes you feel stuff. That’s what puts you there.
People like you are in what we call the reality-based community. You believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of discernible reality. That’s not the way the world really works anymore. We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality (judiciously, as you will), we’ll act again, creating other realities, which you can study, too, and that’s how things will sort out.
Facebook and MySpace are crude personal essay machines.
—the transformation, through framing, of outtakes into totems.
There are two kinds of filmmaking: Hitchcock’s (the film is complete in the director’s mind) and Coppola’s (which thrives on process). For Hitchcock, any variation from the complete internal idea is seen as a defect. The perfection already exists. Coppola’s approach is to harvest the random elements that the process throws up, things that were not in his mind when he began.
You don’t need a story. The question is How long do you not need a story?
Chekhov removed the plot. Pinter, elaborating, removed the history, the narration; Beckett, the characterization. We hear it anyway. Omission is a form of creation.

What we realized was that the novel was a machine to get to twelve crucial speeches in the book about romance and art and music and list-making and masculine distance and the masculine drive for art and the masculine difficulty with intimacy.” This is the case for most novels: you have to read seven hundred pages to get the handful of insights that were the reason the book was written, and the apparatus of the novel is there as a huge, elaborate, overbuilt stage set.

The lyric essay doesn’t expound, is suggestive rather than exhaustive, depends on gaps, may merely mention. It might move by association, leaping from one path of thought to another by way of imagery or connotation, advancing by juxtaposition or sidewinding poetic logic. It often accretes by fragments, taking shape mosaically, its import visible only when one stands back and sees it whole.
Great art is clear thinking about mixed feelings.
I write entirely to find out what I’m thinking, what I’m looking at, what I see, and what it means.
First person is where you can be more interesting; you don’t have to be much but a stumbling fool. And I find this often leads to the more delightful expedition. The wisdom there is more precious than in the sage overview, which in many writers makes me nearly puke.
We have too many things and not enough forms.
For if there is still one hellish, truly accursed thing in our time, it is our artistic dallying with forms, instead of being like victims burnt at the stake, signaling through the flames.
Previously on Kindle 1,2,3,4,5,6

December 05, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

remembering the invisible book club

Warren wrote a very good thing about writing the other day. About just writing. This is me doing that. This is me just typing words in the little white box and clicking publish. Winding up again.

Book six on my Kindle was Zero History by William Gibson. I didn't highlight a lot, maybe it was because of the Invisible Book Club, it didn't need to be on the Kindle because it was in the air. That was a good couple of weeks. It's funny, I remember that book like a gig. It was all around.

I would highlight this, wouldn't I?:

“I adore the full English,” he said. “The offal. Blood pudding. The beans. The bacon."

A different kind of middle distance is nice:

"He was elsewhere, the way people were before their screens, his expression that of someone piloting something, looking into a middle distance that had nothing to do with geography."

Luck, superstition, juju:

"The men who guard the Queen, he’d once told her, were not allowed to wear shoes with rubber soles, or watches with black faces. Why? she’d asked. Juju, he’d said."

Previously on Kindle 1,2,3,4,5

December 04, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

plan an hour

Book five on the Kindle. It's Not What You Think by Chris Evans. An unusual choice for me - mostly read it because Ben recommended it. Good thing though - us both reading this is probably what led to Radio Roundabout. Coming back on December 21st. 

"To plan an hour of radio I actually draw a clock, I use a CD to draw around—it’s the perfect size. I then fill in all the things that must happen at the corresponding times, shade in those areas and then see how much room there is for anything else to happen. That’s the me bit."

"Shows always need pegs to hang their coats on and the more pegs the better—the imparting of information is a great way to do this"

 

November 25, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

OH on the street

Foreign student explaining zebra crossing to colleague: "When you have those striped lines on the road and those blinking lights, cars have to stop. Nobody knows why."

#justtoolongfortwitter

November 21, 2012 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

« Previous | Next »