Russell Davies

As disappointed as you are
About | Feed | Archive | Findings | This blog by email

skuwiki

Whipple

We went to the Whipple Museum a while back and I was struck afterwards by the numbering system. Made me wonder if there's a Dewey Decimal System for objects. I've still not found out if there is.

Then, the other day, I was reading on the Rattle blog about some work they've been doing with the Science Museum, building an ObjectWiki. It's a splendid thing, you can see how it provides the perfect framework for a slew of ideas and memories and images to be added to a particular thing in their collection.

It struck me that this would be a perfect unproduct idea; a way for a maker of things to help add value to the things after they've been bought. An easy way to add serviceness and community to an object.

Imagine if every product you owned had an associated wiki.

I'm imagining a unique page - maybe one per sku (which seems like the smallest practical unit of consumed stuff) - that allows people to add all the basic info you need to know but also pictures of their use of the thing, stories of it etc. And, presumably tagging and scraping would let the page build itself from the stuff that people scatter around the web. Wouldn't that be handy?

It's like there's an unrecorded moment in the life of an object - the time when it's actually being owned and used.

Before we buy it we can talk about it loads and there's a huge attentional focus on it, once it passes into history it gets collected, accessioned, notated and recorded. In the middle, during the actual lived life of the object, not so much.

The people who make those products aren't interested in that process until it's time to sell us another object. Once we've bought something we're mostly on our own with it until it's time for the researchers and archivists and museum-keepers to start thinking about what it all meant to us. They (the museum people) are thinking fascinating things about how to collect and share what they know about things.

Wouldn't it be nice if we (the makers and owners of things) could hand them some of the stories we tell about our things.

Or does it already exist somewhere and I've missed it?

Some of the practical things (specs, links to the latest drivers, service information) are currently done on wikipedia, but it tends to be encyclopedicly dry, and some of it is obviously done on review sites and blogs and the like, but that tends to be a bit of a nightmare to find/navigate.

And there are projects like ProductWiki and  Amapedia but they seem to be more about consumption than ownership. They're more about 'should I buy it?'

And there are fascinating thoughts based on barcodes but that's more to do with 'how was it made?'.

And Fiona was kind enough to point out Thinglink, which is close in a lot of ways, and a brilliant idea, but seems to be more about assertion of ownership rather than stories of living with the thing.

I'm thinking of something that's more about 'how do I make the most of it?', 'what's everyone else doing with it?' 'this is my life with this thing'. I'm after the human stuff, the memories, the associations, the stories, the material that ends up on fansites and curated by communities.

Objecttagging

I guess there's no reason why all this stuff couldn't be aggregated in a single place, behind a single tag / identifier. It'd be like a sort of proto-spime. And there'd be nothing wrong with multiple tags and tagging systems as long as they knew about each other.

Wouldn't it be nice if the product page for some particular sku wasn't just an out of date features video, some driver updates and some broken links to extinct marketing campaigns, what if it reflected the lived life of the product, told by the people who'd bought it?

Annalee Newitz writes this in her essay in Evocative Objects: "Harvard professor of clinical psychiatry John Ratey says that because our brains link ideas together in memory, we are particularly well suited to the act of suffusing an object with emotional value." (here) It'd be nice if someone or something collected those suffusions.

July 04, 2008 in unproduct | Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBack (2)

whatever

I'm sitting here, supposed to be working, listening to Arthur's gran read him an Alex Rider story. She's performing all the youth-speak very gamely but just can't get the intonation right on the 'whatever's.

That's your generation gap right there.

July 03, 2008 in diary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

long photo

I'm writing a presentation for 2gether08 tomorrow and I'm trying to squeeze some long photographs in. Mostly because I don't have anything new to say, but if I say it infront of things that move people might not notice.

I always feel I want to put music on them, because music smears this gloss of meaning on everything, even if entirely spurious. Somehow the niceness of flickr makes me feel like I shouldn't abuse anyone's music rights so I've been using electroplankton to add soundtracks, it's perfect for those fragmenty, moody bits of sound you need, and doesn't make you agonise about whether you got it just right.

These clouds definitely benefit from some luminloops.

As does maneki neko. (And big points to flickr who make embedding this stuff ludicrously easy.)

Strangely I've shot all these on my camera, despite a nice PR bloke sending me a flip video a while back. I've been carrying it around for weeks and have never once found a moment to use it, it seems like a device too far. My camera does video perfectly well, and the flip doesn't do anything clever like time-lapse as the N95 does. (Though it always seems to give up halfway through shooting something.)

July 02, 2008 in images | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)

watching the internet

Appleseed

I've never much liked David Bowie, but I loved the scenes with all the TV monitors in The Man Who Fell To Earth. For someone growing up in a land of three TV channels, it was a splendid vision of informational abundance. Imagine all those channels; you'd never, ever get bored. (That didn't quite work out as planned did it?) And I've loved that wall of monitors / control room feel ever since. The TV room at Graceland, Cy Ogle's sphere of monitors in Interface, this lovely control room in Appleseed Ex Machina, or the one at Fermilab, or at Cyworld. Or the genius of LiveNewsCameras.

Maybe that's why the surveillance/CCTV idea is still so pervasive. People like the idea of control rooms.

Anyway, I've started with a tangent. I didn't really mean to be writing about control rooms. I wanted to write about making glance-able web stuff, specifically a full-screen twitter. If I'm working at home I normally have laptop on my lap, feet on drum stool and a samsung monitor on the table connected to a mac mini showing some combination of itunes, twitterific or the telly. (None of this focus stuff for me, I like to be distracted). And, the screensaver is that RSS twitter combo described by Iain. I like twitter sitting in that bit of my attention, in the corner of the room, glanceable, but not pinging at me like twitterific or twhirl do on my desktop. I want it to be a fullscreen ambient thing, not a peering closely thing. And the Apple RSS screensaver is too slow to update, and too small and swirly to read across the room.

So, I'm wondering if there's a fullscreen twitter application. Something as big, legible and self-starting as twistori. Something I can configure for my friend stream, big type you can read from across the room, nice and clean, no need to be able to write twitters into it. I'm not alone in wanting this but I can't seem to find anything that quite does it. I'm probably being stupid, I'm sure I've read about this sort of thing being done at conferences. Does anyone know of such a thing?

Actually, I suspect we might be entering a phase where it makes sense to build internet things you watch rather than do, things for the other monitor, things that replace the TV you're not really paying attention to with a spare monitor you're not really paying attention to. Like Chumby widgets. Or Poke NYC's upl8.tv. There are lots of little apps that will pop something in the corner of my screen, or scroll it along the bottom but I don't want that level of distraction. I have to filter that cognitively. I want something that pops up in large-type on another screen, across the room, something I can filter physically, by not looking at it. Things in the corner of my screen are only pretending to be peripheral, they're still too close. I want my distractions further away, but bigger. Actually, that's not a bad brief for the internet in general is it? - make it further away, but bigger.

I don't know what I'm saying now. I'll stop.

July 01, 2008 in ideas | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0)

interesting things

Ghostschoolinteresting1_7

Interesting things continue to bubble out splendidly onto the internet. These sketches from Wil seem to capture the spirit of the day brilliantly, and look; extra value for sponsors:

Interestingghostschool2_2

And Gavin's created the Rememble timeline of your writings, thoughts and scribbles, you can see that here.

And, there's now Interesting video at The Guardian. To be honest, I'm not really sure how much they're going to put up, but right now we have James, Gemma, Roo and Jim.

June 30, 2008 in interesting2008 | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

brave noob world

Roo was doing his own videoing at Interesting and has enstucken this brilliant stuff from James Wallis on viddler. Better quality video will follow in due course / at some point / eventually. But this is perfectly watchable, so thanks to Roo and James.

June 25, 2008 in interesting2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

interesting leaking

Rocking

picture by Jenni

In the traditional manner Interesting2008 is starting to leak out all over the internet. I love this bit. The Imagination folks shot everything and made a 'best of' edit which The Guardian are supposed to be putting up, er, sometime. I've not seen it, and I'm not sure when it's going up, but as soon as I know I'll tell you. And, since they shot the whole day, I'm hoping that they'll also make films of each individual speaker. And I'll put them up here. But, if they've not got the resources to do that I'll get the footage off them and do it myself. (Unless someone fancies helping out?). What I'm saying is; the full video stuff won't be quick. Sorry about that.

However, there's lots to content yourselves with in the meantime.

Roo's put his presentation on slideshare, with audio, and created a slideshare group for us. He's also written a fantastic summarising post.

Steve's written a post about his presentation, and also put it on slideshare.

Michael's written his presentation up on his blog already, and I'm sure I've seen bits of it on vimeo or some such, though I can't find it right now.

James promises here that he'll soon be writing up his work on the geophysics of World Of Warcraft, but in the meantime writes some thoughtful and kind words on the playfulness of Interesting.

Tom's stuck the recorder incident on Vimeo. What a work of genius. Though I suspect you had to be there to get the full value.

Simon's put the audio of their performance with Ken on his blog.

James has put In Vino, Civitas on his blog.

Gavin's put a link to more thoughts on Acoustic Cosmology on his blog. And there's some of his music here, which is rather lovely.

I'm sure more people will write about more of their stuff in due course, and I'll try let you know when they do. But you can also browse through, or contribute to, the pictures in the flickr pool.

June 25, 2008 in interesting2008 | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

interesting timelapse

June 23, 2008 in interesting2008 | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (1)

jim on youtube

I didn't want to link to this before Interesting, I thought it would spoil the nice surprise. But, now, here it is:

June 22, 2008 in interesting2008 | Permalink | Comments (14) | TrackBack (1)

interesting running order

Interesting2008graf

picture from Ben

I feel like I'm tempting fate sticking this up now but I guess it might be useful for people if they knew who was speaking when. I should emphasise however that this is just a rough list, subject to, and likely to change. I made the mistake of asking all the speakers when they'd like to go on and they almost all said 'early, but not first'. That of course is not possible so if anyone's really upset with their slot please let me know and we'll negotiate.

It is also entirely possible that I've forgotten someone. If you think you're speaking and you're not on this list please let me know.

8am - Setting up

9am - Wandering in

10am - intro, Roo Reynolds, Gemma Teed, Jenny Owen, Steve Hardy,  Daniel Raven-Ellison

11am - break

11.30am - Michael Johnson, Phil Gyford, James Wallis, Matt Dent, Matt Webb, Andrew Webb, Andrew Walkingshaw, Andrew Dick, Collyn Ahart Chipperfield, Matt Irvine Brown

1ish - lunch

2pm - surprise, Simon James & Ken Hollings, Anna Pickard, Younghee Jung, James Bridle, Kim Plowright, James Houston

3pm - break

3.30pm - Jim Le Fevre, Gavin Starks, Joel Gethin Lewis, George Oates, Lea Becker,  Leisa Riechelt, Max Gadney

4.30ish - end, pub etc.

(Can I also say how stupidly pleased I am to have scheduled a sequence that goes 'Matt Dent, Matt Webb, Andrew Webb, Andrew Walkingshaw'? It's the answer to the question how do you get from Matt Dent to Andrew Walkingshaw using Interesting speakers changing only one name at a time.)

June 20, 2008 in interesting2008 | Permalink | Comments (13) | TrackBack (0)

« Previous | Next »