Russell Davies

As disappointed as you are
About | Feed | Archive | Findings | This blog by email

planners as show runners

I have this work practise of writing in notebooks, and then, when I've finished the notebook, scanning and archiving all the good ideas. It's not as onerous as it sounds. I don't have that many good ideas.

I had a bit of a backlog and in going through them I found some stuff I'd intended to blog while I was computerless. I thought I'd stick them up, if that's OK, hope you can read my writing. Apologies for spelling mistakes etc.

Future31_1

Future32

Future33

Future34_1

January 13, 2006 in ideas | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

true to your metaphor

Cope

This is from a Julian Cope interview in Word magazine. This is better brand strategy advice than you'll find in a stack of business books.

January 13, 2006 in ideas | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (1)

email problems

if you're trying to get hold of me via russell at russelldavies.com and it's not working you might have to be a little patient. Sorry. Network solutions appear to have deleted my email. I'll let you know as soon as it's back up. Or leave a comment here and I'll get in touch.

January 12, 2006 in huh? | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

geekerchief

Geekerchief_1

Found a lovely geek-oriented handkerchief at Magma books in Covent Garden today. It's made by Sukie but doesn't seem to be with the other hankies on the Sukie site.

January 11, 2006 in sites | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

stamping, the human face

Dsc00974_1

I got my copy of Tom Peter's 60 today. On first glance it looks splendid, though I've not had time for a proper look. But what made me really smile were all the stamps, you can't beat the real, organic touch of genuine stamps - they're a sign that an actual person has been involved. And they illustrate that it's come from somewhere other, it's exotic, it's like the crackle on the World Service, it adds to the appeal.

January 10, 2006 in diary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

walking back to happiness

Popped out at lunchtime to visit the Richard Long show at the Haunch Of Venison gallery.

Dsc01096

I liked it. I liked that it was quick to visit but still worthwhile. I liked that he's picked a thing to do and he keeps doing it, you don't get the sense that's he relentlessly searching for novelty, he's found something that he thinks is good and he's been doing it since the 60s. And he's had a consistent typographical and graphic approach which gives the stuff a pleasingly timeless quality, like those Swiss railway clocks.

Dsc01095

But most of all I think I envied his life. It seems like a great gig. Though I'm sure there is much travail along the way.

Dsc01093_1

The title of one of his works reminded me of a post I want to do about the benefits of simplicity and of complexity. Must get around to that.

January 10, 2006 in diary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

video expertise (kind of)

Expertise

OK, here's the first of the serious videoblogging experiment things. Since I didn't get a question before the weekend I had a ramble about something I've been thinking about recently - the value of sharing a brand's expertise. It's not enormously coherent, but there might be something in it and it's only 5 minutes long.

There's two versions - .m4v which is optimised for ipods etc and a straight .mov version.

expertise.m4v (About 22MB)

expertise.mov (About 6MB)

And here's the Sherry Turkle piece referenced in the video. And here's the book of cool site.

Let me know what you think.

January 09, 2006 in Account Planning School Of The Web | Permalink | Comments (13) | TrackBack (0)

Belsize Walk

Dsc01036_1

Walked through up through Regent's Park and went on the Belsize Way. There's a guide here.

Dsc01033

To start with it was pleasant, but kind of boring, I wasn't suprised to learn that a lot of Belsize was developed as a rival to Kensington - it's got the same big, blandly impressive feel. If slightly untidier - full of academics and lawyers rather than Eurotrash and models.

Dsc01032_1

So I was quite pleased to see a bit of tagging on a wall, made the place feel a bit more lived in.

Dsc01031

Dsc01029_1

I did like the look of England's Lane. You could easily imagine it being used allegorically by a N. London novelist. Has there yet been a novel called 'The Bins On England's Lane'

Dsc01035

And being early January you see these corpses of Christmas all over the place.

Dsc01034

It gets more interesting as you head towards Hampstead but you also realise that this is the place where the cultural elite was hatched. From Girl Guides to Montessori schools, Bloomsbury, communism, Air Studios, the BBC, Lee Miller, Roland Penrose, Goldfinger, they're all on this walk. And so you can see where the vision of Britain we're often being sold has come from. Little shops, leafy streets and everyone living within a dog's walk of Hampstead Heath - this is what we're supposed to aspire to.

Dsc01051

I keep promising myself I'll go swimming here one day - or more excitingly winter swimming in The Serpentine.

Dsc01055

So then I sat on Kite Hill and realised I could see the BT Tower in the distance, and since that's just about where we live I thought I'd try and navigate my way back - which was slightly perilous, becuase I don't really know North London. But there were a bunch of interesting things on, what I think was, Southampton Road.

Dsc01060

Dsc01062

Dsc01063

Dsc01073

January 06, 2006 in walking | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

shuffleswap

Bigshuffle

I read this article in The Guardian today - about various popstars swapping ipods, it made me think I'd love to swap ipods with interesting people and discover some new music. I've got a shuffle sitting in a box that I don't really use any more (since I was lucky enough to get a nice nano) - it's loaded up with a fairly random selection of stuff from everything I own. Anyone want to swap?

January 06, 2006 in ideas | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

that is the question

You've probably seen the edge.org question project and been daunted by the sheer amount of stuff, as I was, in answer to the question:

'WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA? - The history of science is replete with discoveries that were considered socially, morally, or emotionally dangerous in their time; the Copernican and Darwinian revolutions are the most obvious. What is your dangerous idea? An idea you think about (not necessarily one you originated) that is dangerous not because it is assumed to be false, but because it might be true?'

But last night I took the plunge, printed out all 140 or so pages and ploughed through it. Most of it is way too clever for me and many of the answers are deeply, abstractly, philosophical or mathematical. Stuff I'd like to think I understand, but actually, don't.

But in my normal bid to make something trivial out of something profound I've plucked out the pieces that might help us all think differently about brands, communications, people and all that.

1. Leo Chalupa - a 24-hour period of absolute solitude.

Actually, I'm not sure this tells us anything about brands and stuff, but it definitely sounds like a good idea. And maybe it should make us think about the dangers of over-communicating and being too oppresive with the amount of stuff we throw at people.

2. Marco Iacoboni - Media Violence Induces Imitative Violence: The Problem With Super Mirrors

If true this is obviously troubling for those of us selling video-games or movies. And you could also see implications in here for understanding how advertising/marketing communications might work. (Since no-one really knows.) And it also raises ethical issues about that. People who defend advertising (like me) often do so on the basis that it's actually a very weak force and people are free to make up their own minds about what they do. But maybe this suggests they're less free than we think.

I'm not sure I buy this one, but then it's in my interest not to, and I have absolutely no professional expertise on the subject.

3. Juan Enriquez - Technology can untie the US

This is definitely an interesting idea, and contains a killer fact - 'There has yet to be a single US president buried under the same flag he was born under'. But the larger point I think we should all remember is that a lot of the continuity we take for granted is probably illusiory.

4. Andy Clark - The quick thinking zombies inside us

This is something we're all starting to realise, if we've been reading any neuroscience or Malcolm Gladwell (and I don't know what else you might be doing all weekend). It would seem that many of the decisions we make are made by 'quick thinking zombies' - our evolutionarily sound instincts - and then post-rationalised by some other bit of the brain, and presented to 'us' as a rational decision. Which would suggest - again - that the rational content in ads is perhaps the least important stuff.

5. Sherry Turkle - After several generations of living in the computer culture, simulation will become fully naturalized. Authenticity in the the traditional sense loses its value, a vestige of another time

If you only read one of these, just read this one, it's really interesting. She tells a great story about chiidren and robot turtles which makes you examine all your assumptions about 'authenticity' and makes me think about whether our striving for brand authenticity is really that important. And wouldn't narrative coherence and utility be more useful ideas.

Then she talks about some experimental robots designed to provide company to people in nursing homes - they simulate some of the comforts provided by a friend or a pet, with touch or with eye contact, and she wonders about the validity of these relationships. She calls these things 'relational artifacts' - and isn't that a perfect way to think about brands? We try and build relationships between brands and people, but we don't think enough about the ultimate impossibility of these being 'real' relationships. Maybe this isn't a problem, but it's definitely something we should remember to think about.

6. Steven Strogatz - The End Of Insight

Strogatz is talking about higher mathmatics and worries that insight is becoming impossible - that all the problems that are comprehenable by the mind have already been comprehended. There are things we can prove - like the four-colour map theorem - but we can't understand why they're true.

I can't pretend to know what he's talking about, but I think we've reached the end of insight in our little planning world. I suspect that in many markets, with many consumers, in many countries, we've finally scraped the bottom of the insight barrel. And though we desperately reach for new tools like ethnography or hypnotism it's clear that there's nothing new consumers can tell us.

I love this. Because it means we have to fall back on our own resources and actually have some ideas - which is a good thing.

7. Stewart Brand - What if public policy makers have an obligation to engage historians, and historians have an obligation to help?

A lot of planners were once historians. I've got a history degree (though not a great one) and I've always thought it was largely irrelevant, and it probably is. But Brand raises the interesting idea of 'Applied History' - using history to illuminate future decisions - in reality that's what a lot of us do, a lot of the time (that's what competive reviews are all about, and every pitch process probably has a bit of applied history in it) - maybe if we called it Applied History our inner academics would find it a little more nourishing.

8. Daniel Goleman - Cyber-disinhibition

This is warning for us all - both personally and professionally. Goleman reminds us that electronic communications tools don't provide for nautral, human, feedback - we're 'talking to' people but we don't see, feel, touch, sense them, and this reduces the human inhibitions which make for reasonable relationships. Put simply, we're much less likely to 'flame' people if we see them in person.

We've all realised this in our personal interactions - we learn to moderate our online/email communications. But it's something that brands should think about too - as our relationship tools become increasingly virtual. If our relationships with our customers are entirely electronic are we getting all kinds of nuances seriously wrong, and are we missing all sorts of cues?

9. Richard E Nisbett - Telling More Than We Can Know

Similar stuff here to Andy Clark's ideas about quick-thinking zombies but no less powerful for that. Again we are reminded of Blink - we simply do not know and cannot explain why we've made many of the decisions we make. And if we do have an explanation, it's probably wrong. Which means that most market research is useless (haven't you always suspected that?) - at least it's useless in doing what it normally says it does, it's incredibly useful for all sorts of other reasons.

(And if you've got all kinds of clever ways of subverting this problem please don't write and tell me about them.)

Anyway, that's it for me. This is why I love the internet - all that fascinating stimulation, just sitting there to be lapped up. I'd heartily encourage you to go and have a read.

January 05, 2006 in ideas | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)

« Previous | Next »