Russell Davies

As disappointed as you are
About | Feed | Archive | Findings | This blog by email

undercover economist

031673293102lzzzzzzz

This is well worth getting. In the tradition of Freakonomics and Blink etc, but a bit more about the real world of life and brands we all deal with, rather than rarified worlds of art or drug-dealing.

Mr Harford's site is well worth visiting too. There are lots of great links on there and a fantastic piece on presentations the easy way.

April 27, 2006 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0)

fast food, fast book

184627029402lzzzzzzz

Kevin Jackson has written this splendid book - Fast: Feasting On The Streets Of London. (the image above is from the book, off of Amazon).  Portobello books were kind enough to send me a copy.

It's splendidly enthusiastic about all the brilliant varieties of Fast Food you can get in London from kebabs to eels. (Though it's predictably sniffy about the corporate varieties.) It's dense with all the little facts you want to know about the histories of London's coffee houses, Milk Bars and chip shops. It has a nice line in mixing the trivial anecdote with the heavyweight academic reference and I really like the photography. You really get a sense of an author who likes what he's writing about, which meant I powered through it in an evening, using little sticky notes to mark all the places I'm very keen to visit. Top stuff.

April 25, 2006 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

best book ever

diary_of_ad_man_book_cover

This was written during WWII by a famous american copywriter. (He also wrote 'a technique for producing ideas' which still stands up today as a great guide). It started as a diary that ran in Ad Age, and was turned into a book later. Although Young was writing in a very different age and a very different world (and clearly he could be a bit of a git) a lot of what he says about advertising (and other more trivial stuff, like life) holds true today.

I've going to fill the odd idle moment by quoting some of the stuff he said (assuming his estate don't have a big problem with that).

Here's an entry which could serve as a description of the satisfactions of blogging:

Sunday...August 16th 1942

Pleased to get from the Editor some letters which indicate that, now and then, somebody reads this Diary. Showed them to my wife - who still wonders why. If a man likes the sound of words, putting them together may be its own reward. But I notice that a neighbour of mine, who often sits on his doorstep of an evening, playing a flute to himself, doesn't mind a little audience either.


April 27, 2004 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (2)

have a go kevin

lovemarks.jpg

I read Kevin Robert's Lovemarks book on the flight to New York. (Very bad airplane book - takes a lots of luggage space but only about half an hour to read.)

Obviously it's easy to criticise (mostly because it's rubbish; facile, arrogant, and shockingly badly designed). But you've got to applaud the bloke's energy and enthusiasm. And at least he's trying to move the debate about brands forward. It's just unfortunate that he's moving it forward from some point in the late 80s.

April 19, 2004 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (8)

weird ideas that work

largecvr2.gif

just read weird ideas that work by robert i. sutton. good round up of thinking about creativity and innovation in organisations. not a ton of substantial new stuff if you work for a creative business, you can whip through it in a night, but lots of good quotes and anecdotes.

quotes:

"to invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk" - thomas edison

"discovery consists of looking at the same thing as everyone else and thinking something different" - albert szent-gyorgi

"I went to Berkley (rather than Caltech or Stanford) because it had the worst computer facilities of the three. I figured it would force me to be more ingenious" - bill joy

"creativity is a consequence of sheer productivity. if a creator wants to increase the production of hits, he or she must do it by risking a parallel increase in the production of misses...the most successful creators tend to be those with the most failures" - dean keith simonton

"the best engineers sometimes come in bodies that can't talk" nolan bushnell

"fail early, fail often" - david kelley, ideo

"every strike brings me closer to the next home run" - babe ruth

"i can't ask my customers what they want. they haven't been born yet" - an engineer from Xerox PARC

thoughts:

from weird ideas that work (page 11):

vu ja de - when you feel or act like an experience is brand new even if you've seen it a thousand times before. first used, pejorativlely, by Karl Weick about a group of smokejumpers who died in a fire because they forgot what they knew. But forgetting what you know can be very useful for creatives.

February 13, 2004 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (0)

clever man

I exchanged email with my old boss yesterday. He's a clever and lovely man. And I checked out his new website. I can heartily recommend a visit, and would suggest you work with him at some point if you can. He'll teach you a lot.

September 11, 2003 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (0)

east end underworld

just started reading nobrow by john seabrook. seems very good so far. but it reminded me how slightly odd it seems when american's describe british music and musicians. he describes underworld as an 'essex-based' band which, I guess, is kinda true, but seems completely off any point. I suppose we do the same when we talk about american music, though maybe not, we're more familiar with their culture than they are with ours. still, looks like it's going to be an interesting read.

September 10, 2003 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (1)

inevitably dissappointing

just finished reading Inevitable Surprises by Peter Schwartz. Disappointing because I really wanted to dislike it, and it wasn't that bad. Wasn't that good either. I guess it's a useful round-up of things to think about in the future. But like all GBN things there seems to be this huge gap between the scenarios they describe and the practical world we live in. Not that I'm questioning their scenarios; they're always very informed, thoughful and imaginative. But one can never quite see what you're supposed to do about it. Perhaps it's because I'm a person and not a large organisation. They'd probably say it's a failing in me. That I'm not being imaginative enough.

I have a weird relationship with GBN, I went to a number of events through my boss and my company. And I found them really interesting in the abstract, and the website was full of provocative debate. But the events were always very off-putting. Maybe because I'm chronically unsociable, I didn't get much out of the social side and the 'learning journeys' always put me off. The worst moment was a learning journey in San Francisco at the height of the dotcom boom. The little group I was in; venture capitalists, corporate executives, senior NGO people, were supposed to go and visit various non-profits including a women's shelter. I just found the idea depressing, all these tossy business people peering at people like they were anthropolgical exhibits. I just ducked out. Didn't go back. Stupid really, but I hated their whole vibe.

Maybe it's changed now, I should revist the website and see.

September 09, 2003 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (0)

what a waste

just read a terrible book - Mao in the Boardroom: Marketing Genius from the Mind of the Master Guerrilla
by Gabriel Stricker. Disappointing really, because I was looking forward to it. And it's not a bad idea. Obviously it's in a fairly predictable vein but it could have been good - a playful, lateral take on marketing/guerilla marketing, but instead it's just dire. It obviously took about two days to write. The Mao quotes could have been gleaned from an average quotation dictionary in about an hour. The stories/examples are all the most usual, most predictable companies and campaigns. Swatch. And1. Target. Virgin. blah blah blah. I've heard every story before somewhere. And the attempts at cartoony Mao-based human are completely feeble and unfunny. And every now and then he just gets stuff plain wrong. Not a good book. Avoid.

September 05, 2003 in reviews | Permalink | Comments (0)